中西太平洋鲣鱼不同鱼群资源丰度的影响因子比较
作者:
中图分类号:

S931.1

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划(2023YFD2401303)


Relationship between different factors and abundance index of skipjack tuna(Katsuwonus pelamis) in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean
Author:
  • ZHU Ruoya

    ZHU Ruoya

    College of Marine Living Resource Sciences and Management, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
    在期刊界中查找
    在百度中查找
    在本站中查找
  • CHEN Xinjun

    CHEN Xinjun

    College of Marine Living Resource Sciences and Management, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China;Key Laboratory of Sustainable Exploitation of Oceanic Fisheries Resources, Ministry of Education, Shanghai 201306, China;National Engineering Research Center for Oceanic Fisheries, Shanghai 201306, China;Key Laboratory of Sustainable Utilization of Oceanic Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shanghai 201306, China
    在期刊界中查找
    在百度中查找
    在本站中查找
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [20]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了探究鲣鱼(Katsuwonus pelamis)自由鱼群和随附鱼群资源丰度受环境与其他种群因子影响的差异。采用2011—2020年中西太平洋鲣鱼的生产统计数据,结合同时期海洋环境数据:海表面温度(Sea surface temperature,SST)、海表面盐度(Sea surface salinity,SSS)和叶绿素a质量浓度( Chlorophyll-a mass concentration,Chl.a),以中西太平洋海域的黄鳍金枪鱼(Thunnus albacares)和大眼金枪鱼(Thunnus obesus)的资源丰度作为其他种群因子,基于广义加性模型(Generalized addictive models,GAM)对两种鱼群的影响因素进行分析,并通过赤池信息准则进行模型比较。结果显示,其他种群因子是对两种鱼群影响最大的因子,解释偏差率分别达到了31.40%和67.00%。对于自由鱼群而言,除其他种群因子之外,经度和月份影响较大,其解释偏差率分别为4.15%和4.14%;环境因子中SST最为重要,解释偏差率为3.90%,其次是SSS,解释偏差率为3.78%,Chl.a的影响相对较低,解释偏差率为1.40%;对于随附鱼群而言,除其他种群因子之外,月份和经度影响较大,其解释偏差率分别为20.70%和10.60%;环境因子中SSS影响较大,解释偏差率为8.37%,Chl.a和SST影响较低,解释偏差率为1.13%和0.19%。研究认为,未来的渔情预报模型中需要考虑其他种群因子的影响,以期为今后金枪鱼围网渔场学研究和科学寻找渔场提供参考依据。

    Abstract:

    The main objective of this study is to investigate the differences in the abundance of free-swimming school and associated school of Katsuwonus pelamis influenced by environmental and other population factors. This study utilized the production statistics from 2011 to 2020, combined with marine environmental factors (SST, SSS, Chl.a), the CPUE data for yellowfin tuna and bigeye tuna in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean are used as other population factors.A generalized additive model (GAM) was used to analyze the two fish populations separately, and the final model was confirmed through the akaike information criterion.The results indicate that other population factors had the most significant influence on both school types, and the explanatory deviation rates were 31.40% and 67.00%. For free-swimming schools, longitude and month were significant besides other population factors, and their interpretation deviation rates were 4.15% and 4.14%. Among the environmental factors, SST was the most important, with an explanatory deviation rate of 3.90%, followed by SSS with an explanatory deviation rate of 3.78%, and Chl.a had a lesser impact, with an explanatory deviation rate of only 1.40%. For associated schools, month and longitude were significant, and their interpretation deviation rates were 20.70% and 10.60%. Among the environmental factors, SSS was the most influential, with an explanatory deviation rate of 8.37%,while Chl.a and SST had lesser impacts,with explanatory deviation rates of 1.13% and 0.19%.It is concluded that the effects of other population factors should be considered in the future fishery forecasting models.With the aim of providing a reference for future research in the field of tuna purse-seine fisheries and for the scientific identification of fishing grounds.

    参考文献
    [1] COLLETTE B, NAUEN C E. FAO species catalogue:vol. 2 scombrids of the world:an annotated and illustrated catalogue of tunas, mackerels, bonitosand related species known to date[R]. Rome:FAO, 1983:83-86.
    [2] JIN S F, FAN W. Review and perspectives on skipjack tuna fishery under global climate change[J]. Fishery Information& Strategy, 2014, 29(4):272-279.靳少非,樊伟.鲣鱼资源开发利用研究现状及未来气候变化背景下研究展望[J].渔业信息与战略, 2014, 29(4):272-279.
    [3] JIANG M F, CHEN X J, XU Z A, et al. Spatial clustering characteristics of Katsuwonus pelamis in West and Central Pacific Ocean and its relationship with ENSO[J]. Periodical of Ocean University of China, 2023, 53(11):47-54.蒋明峰,陈新军,许子安,等.中西太平洋鲣鱼空间聚类特征及其与ENSO的关系[J].中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 53(11):47-54.
    [4] Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC). The Commission for the Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean[R].WCPFC, 2020:1-15.
    [5] LEHODEY P, BERTIGNAC M, HAMPTON J, et al. El Niño Southern Oscillation and tuna in the western Pacific[J]. Nature, 1997, 389(6652):715-718.
    [6] TANG H, XU L X, CHEN X J, et al. Effects of spatiotemporal and environmental factors on the fishing ground of skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean based on generalized additive model[J]. Marine Environmental Science, 2013, 32(4):518-522.唐浩,许柳雄,陈新军,等.基于GAM模型研究时空及环境因子对中西太平洋鲣鱼渔场的影响[J].海洋环境科学, 2013, 32(4):518-522.
    [7] XU L X, WANG X F, ZHU G P, et al. Analysis on stock structure of free swimming skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) school caught by China tuna purse seine in the Western andCentral Pacific Ocean[J]. Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology, 2010(2):22-28.许柳雄,王学昉,朱国平,等.中西太平洋金枪鱼围网鲣鱼起水鱼群种群结构分析[J].海洋湖沼通报, 2010(2):22-28.
    [8] CAO J, WANG X F, DAMIANO M D, et al. A Bayesian multilevel ordinal regression model for fish maturity data:difference in maturity ogives of skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) between schools in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean[J]. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2021, 8:736462.
    [9] FANG Z, CHEN Y Y, CHEN X J, et al. Influence of environmental factors on the abundance of skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) in west-central Pacific Ocean determined using different models[J]. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 2018, 25(5):1123-1130.方舟,陈洋洋,陈新军,等.基于不同模型研究环境因子对中西太平洋鲣资源丰度的影响[J].中国水产科学, 2018, 25(5):1123-1130.
    [10] ALABIA I D, SAITOH SI, IGARASHI H, et al. Ensemble squid habitat model using three-dimensional ocean data[J]. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 2016, 73(7):1863-1874.
    [11] GUAN W J. R Yu Yan Zai Hai Yang Yu Ye Zhong De Ying Yong[M]. Beijing:China Ocean Press, 2015.官文江. R语言在海洋渔业中的应用[M].北京:海洋出版社, 2015.
    [12] MORENO G, BOYRA G, SANCRISTOBAL I, et al. Towards acoustic discrimination of tropical tuna associated with Fish Aggregating Devices[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(6):e0216353.
    [13] VAIHOLA S, KININMONTH S. Ecosystem management policy implications based on Tonga main tuna species catch data 2002-2018[J]. Diversity, 2023, 15(10):1042.
    [14] CHEN Y Y, CHEN X J. Influence of El Nino/La Nina on the abundance index of skipjack in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean[J]. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University, 2017, 26(1):113-120.陈洋洋,陈新军.厄尔尼诺/拉尼娜现象对中西太平洋鲣资源丰度的影响[J].上海海洋大学学报, 2017, 26(1):113-120.
    [15] WANG W S, TANG W, GONG Y H, et al. Modeling habitat of skipjack tuna of free swimming school in Western and Central Pacific Ocean based on MaxEnt model[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(5):11-21.汪伟松,唐未,龚一赫,等.基于MaxEnt模型模拟中西太平洋鲣自由鱼群栖息地的研究[J].南方水产科学, 2023, 19(5):11-21.
    [16] FENG H N, LU H J, WANG J T. Spatial-temporal distribution of CPUE and its relation with environmental factors for skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) from purse-seine fishery in Western and Central Pacific Ocean[J]. Journal of Guangdong Ocean University, 2023, 43(1):33-40.冯虎年,陆化杰,汪金涛.中西太平洋围网鲣鱼CPUE时空分布与环境因子关系[J].广东海洋大学学报, 2023, 43(1):33-40.
    [17] DAGORN L, HOLLAND K N, RESTREPO V, et al. Is it good or bad to fish with FADs?What are the real impacts of the use of drifting FADs on pelagic marine ecosystems?[J]. Fish and Fisheries, 2013, 14(3):391-415.
    [18] LIU Z Q,GUO S J,WANG Y C,et al. Hook depth distribution and influencing factors of tuna longline fishing in Western and Central Pacific Ocean[J]. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University,2024,33(4):1020-1030.刘志强,郭绍健,王禹程,等.中西太平洋金枪鱼延绳钓钓钩深度分布及其影响因素[J].上海海洋大学学报,2024,33(4):1020-1030.
    [19] ANDRADE H A. The relationship between the skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) fishery and seasonal temperature variability in the south‐western Atlantic[J]. Fisheries Oceanography, 2003, 12(1):10-18.
    [20] LLOPIZ J K, HOBDAY A J. A global comparative analysis of the feeding dynamics and environmental conditions of larval tunas, mackerels, and billfishes[J]. Deep Sea Research Part Ⅱ:Topical Studies in Oceanography, 2015, 113:113-124.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

朱若雅,陈新军.中西太平洋鲣鱼不同鱼群资源丰度的影响因子比较[J].上海海洋大学学报,2025,34(2):403-412.
ZHU Ruoya, CHEN Xinjun. Relationship between different factors and abundance index of skipjack tuna(Katsuwonus pelamis) in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean[J]. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University,2025,34(2):403-412.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:36
  • 下载次数: 83
  • HTML阅读次数: 31
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-24
  • 最后修改日期:2024-10-24
  • 录用日期:2024-10-30
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-03-13
文章二维码