基于鱼类完整性指数的上海黄浦江骨干人工河流水生态系统健康评价
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S 931.1

基金项目:

上海市生态环境局2021年上海骨干河道鱼类多样性调查及水生态健康评估项目(D-8005-21-0063);国家重点研发计划(2018YFD0900802)


Ecological health assessment of five backbone artificial rivers of the Huangpu River in Shanghai based on fish index of biotic integrity
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

fish diversity survey and aquatic ecological health assessment in backbone river in Shanghai in 2021 of Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Ecology and Environment; National Key R & D Program of China (2018YFD0900802)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为深入了解上海黄浦江5条骨干人工河流的生态系统现状,采用鱼类生物完整性指数(F-IBI)方法对其水生态系统的健康状况作了评价。2021年6月(夏季)和11月(秋季)租用专业渔船在5条河流共计20个断面采集到鱼类标本10 092尾,隶属于8目17科45属60种。以黄浦江上游为参照点,设置了5大类29个初选指标,然后根据分布范围筛选、判别能力筛选和相关性检验,构建了由8个指标组成的F-IBI评价体系。分析结果表明,金汇港和龙泉港总体处于“好”或“一般”的状态;大治河、川杨河和淀浦河空间差异较大,从“差”到“好”均有。其中夏季有14个采样断面为“一般”,各有3个采样断面为“好”或“差”;秋季有11个采样断面为“一般”,5个采样断面为“好”,4个采样断面为“差”。5条人工河流下游的健康状况普遍好于上游,但总体上与流经上海中心城区的黄浦江自然支流苏州河的健康状况相比较为均一。这些结果为上海黄浦江5条骨干人工河流的环境管理提供了参考资料。

    Abstract:

    To have a comprehensive understanding towards the current status of ecosystem of five backbone artificial rivers of the Huangpu River in Shanghai, the fish biological integrity index (F-IBI) evaluation method was adopted to evaluate the health of water ecosystem of the artificial rivers. Professional fishing boats were rented to collect the sample fishes at 20 sections of the five rivers in June (summer) and November (autumn) of 2021, and 10 092 fish specimens were obtained, belonging to 8 orders, 17 families, 45 genera and 60 species. Taking the upper stream of the Huangpu River as the reference point, 29 primary indicators in five categories were initially set. In accordance with distribution range screening, judgement screening capability and correlation test, the F-IBI evaluation system composed of 8 indicators was constructed. The results show that Jinhui Port and Longquan Port are in state of “Good” or “Average”; there are significance spatial differences in Dazhi River, Chuanyang River and Dianpu River, ranging from “Poor” to “Good”. In summer, there were 14 sampling points in status of “Average”, and 3 sampling points were in status of “Good” or “Poor” respectively; in autumn, there were 11 sampling points in status of “Average”, 5 sampling points were in state status of “Good” and 4 sampling sites were in status “Poor”. The health of the downstream of the five artificial rivers is basically better than that of the upstream, but generally it is more uniform than that of Suzhou River, the natural tributary of the Huangpu River flowing through the central urban area of Shanghai. These results provided the reference for the environmental management of the five backbone artificial rivers of the Huangpu River in Shanghai.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

高敏佳,陈振锋,张彦彦,龚珑,张亚,唐振,赵振官,唐文乔.基于鱼类完整性指数的上海黄浦江骨干人工河流水生态系统健康评价[J].上海海洋大学学报,2024,33(1):99-113.
GAO Minjia, CHEN Zhenfeng, ZHANG Yanyan, GONG Long, ZHANG Ya, TANG Zhen, ZHAO Zhenguan, TANG Wenqiao. Ecological health assessment of five backbone artificial rivers of the Huangpu River in Shanghai based on fish index of biotic integrity[J]. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University,2024,33(1):99-113.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-27
  • 最后修改日期:2023-05-22
  • 录用日期:2023-05-22
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-01-29
  • 出版日期: 2024-01-20
文章二维码