上海青草沙水库生态护坡区浮游植物的群落结构
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

X171

基金项目:

蓝色粮仓项目湖泊生态增养殖模式与净水渔业技术体系(2019YFD0900605);上海市科学技术委员会部分地方院校能力建设项目(19050501900)


Phytoplankton community structure of ecological slope protection area of Shanghai Qingcaosha reservoir
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Blue Granary Project: Lake Ecological Cultivation Mode and Water Purification Fishery Technology System, No.2019YFD0900605; Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center Project of Aquatic Animal Genetics and Breeding Center of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (No.ZF1206)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    2017年上海青草沙水库建设了生态护坡,为探究其对水体浮游植物群落结构的影响,于2018年逐月对该水库生态护坡区和库内对照区的浮游植物群落进行调查比较。共鉴定出生态护坡区浮游植物201种,库内对照区194种,两区域物种达中等相似,且种类组成均为绿藻-硅藻-蓝藻型。生态护坡区和库内对照区优势种以蓝藻门和硅藻门为主,且基本相同,优势度较大的优势种为隐球藻属未定种(Aphanocapsa sp.)、湖泊伪鱼腥藻(Pseudanabaena limnetica)、小环藻属未定种(Cyclotella sp.)和模糊沟链藻(Aulacoseira ambigua)。生态护坡区浮游植物群落密度、生物量年均值依次为(578.46±455.30)×104 cells/L、(1.55±1.03)mg/L,库内对照区依次为(663.46±588.67)×104 cells/L、(1.61±0.98)mg/L,两区域浮游植物现存量无显著差异(P>0.05)。主坐标PCOA分析表明生态护坡区和库内对照区浮游植物群落结构差异不显著(P>0.05)。上述结果表明生态护坡的建设对水库浮游植物群落基本不造成影响。

    Abstract:

    In 2017, a large reservoir named Qingcaosha in Shanghai built an ecological slope protection. In order to explore its impact on the structure of the phytoplankton community, a monthly survey and comparison study of the phytoplankton community in the ecological slope protection area of the reservoir and the control area in the reservoir was carried out in 2018. A total of 201 species of phytoplankton in the ecological slope protection area and 194 species in the control area in the reservoir were identified. The species in the two regions were moderately similar, and the species composition was both Chlorophyta-Bacillariophyta-Cyanophytatype. The dominant species in the ecological slope protection area and the control area of the reservoir mainly belonged to Chlorophyta and Bacillariophyta, which were basically the same. The dominant species with a high degree of dominance were Aphanocapsa sp., Pseudanabaena limnetica, and Cyclotella sp. and Aulacoseira ambigua. The annual mean biological density and biomass of the community atecological slope protection areawere (578.46±455.30)×104 cells/L and (1.55±1.03) mg/L, respectively, and those of the control area in the reservoir were respectively (663.46±588.67)×104 cells/L and (1.61±0.98) mg/L. There was no significant difference in phytoplankton stock between the two areas (P>0.05). The PCOA analysis of the principal coordinates showed that there was no significant difference in phytoplankton community structure between the ecological slope protection area and the control area in the reservoir (P>0.05). The above results all demonstrate that the construction of the ecological slope protection has little impact on the phytoplankton community of the reservoir.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

申利亚,赵丹,马婕,牛文卉,陈立婧.上海青草沙水库生态护坡区浮游植物的群落结构[J].上海海洋大学学报,2022,31(2):400-410.
SHEN Liya, ZHAO Dan, MA Jie, NIU Wenhui, CHEN Lijing. Phytoplankton community structure of ecological slope protection area of Shanghai Qingcaosha reservoir[J]. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University,2022,31(2):400-410.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-24
  • 最后修改日期:2021-03-27
  • 录用日期:2021-09-22
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-03-29
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码